Considering a second citizenship through investment? You're not alone. Citizenship by Investment (CBI) programs offer a pathway to new passports in exchange for significant economic contributions, creating opportunities for global mobility, business expansion, and lifestyle flexibility.

But there's an important player you need to know about: the Financial Action Task Force (FATF). This global watchdog increasingly shapes how these programs operate and who gets approved.

The citizenship landscape is evolving rapidly, with heightened scrutiny from international authorities concerned about potential misuse. Understanding this regulatory environment isn't just for compliance experts—it's essential knowledge for anyone exploring citizenship options today.

In this comprehensive guide, we'll explore how FATF evaluations impact CBI programs worldwide, what this means for your application journey, and how to navigate the changing requirements successfully.

Understanding FATF and Its Role in CBI Programs

What is FATF?

The Financial Action Task Force is essentially the global sheriff of financial integrity. Established in 1989, this intergovernmental body sets international standards to combat money laundering, terrorist financing, and other threats to the global financial system.

With members including major economies and regional organizations, FATF wields significant influence through its recommendations and country evaluations. Think of it as the organization ensuring that wealth moves through legitimate channels worldwide.

For citizenship programs, FATF's focus is clear: ensuring these pathways to new nationalities don't become backdoors for illicit funds or individuals escaping justice.

FATF's Evaluation Process

FATF employs a thorough review system known as "mutual evaluations" to assess how well countries implement its standards. These evaluations examine technical compliance with FATF recommendations and, crucially, how effectively countries apply these rules in practice.

Countries found wanting may face inclusion on FATF monitoring lists—with serious implications for their financial relationships worldwide. For citizenship programs specifically, evaluators scrutinize whether proper safeguards prevent misuse by high-risk individuals or funds of questionable origin.

The stakes are high: a negative assessment can trigger additional due diligence from international banks, limit foreign investment, and ultimately force significant reform of citizenship programs.

The Grey List and Blacklist Explained

When FATF identifies significant deficiencies in a country's anti-money laundering framework, it may place that jurisdiction on one of two public lists:

The "grey list" (officially called "Jurisdictions under Increased Monitoring") includes countries actively working with FATF to address strategic deficiencies. While less severe than blacklisting, grey-listed countries face enhanced scrutiny, potentially affecting everything from correspondent banking relationships to investment flows.

The more serious "blacklist" (officially "High-Risk Jurisdictions Subject to a Call for Action") identifies countries with severe deficiencies requiring urgent attention. Currently, only Iran, North Korea, and Myanmar occupy this list.

For citizenship programs, a country's listing status serves as a critical indicator of program integrity and risk level for potential applicants.

FATF Evaluations of Major CBI Jurisdictions

Caribbean Programs

The Eastern Caribbean is home to the world's most established citizenship programs, with five nations offering pathways to citizenship through investment. Here's where they stand with FATF:

Antigua & Barbuda, Dominica, Grenada, St. Kitts & Nevis, and St. Lucia all operate active CBI programs that contribute significantly to their economies. As of early 2025, none of these countries appear on FATF's grey or blacklists—a positive indicator of their compliance efforts.

However, recent evaluations have highlighted areas for improvement. Dominica's 2023 assessment by the Caribbean FATF (CFATF) noted the CBI program's enormous economic impact—accounting for approximately 29.5% of GDP in 2020—while flagging that the country had not yet conducted a formal risk assessment of its CBI sector.

The Caribbean programs have been proactive in enhancing their compliance frameworks, recognizing that their economic sustainability depends on maintaining good standing with international watchdogs.

European Programs

The European Union has seen significant turbulence in its citizenship-by-investment landscape:

Malta faced a watershed moment in 2021 when it became the first EU nation ever grey-listed by FATF. While multiple factors contributed to this designation, Malta's Individual Investor Programme drew particular scrutiny regarding beneficial ownership transparency and financial crime enforcement.

The Maltese government responded with an ambitious action plan that strengthened controls and enhanced information sharing. These efforts paid off with Malta's removal from the grey list after just one year, by June 2022. Today, Malta continues to operate the EU's only remaining CBI program, albeit under significant oversight.

Cyprus and Bulgaria both terminated their citizenship programs under intense pressure. Cyprus shut down its "golden passport" scheme in 2020 following corruption scandals, while Bulgaria abolished its investor citizenship pathway in 2022 after criticism from EU authorities. Bulgaria subsequently landed on FATF's grey list in 2023 due to broader AML shortcomings.

The European Commission is now pushing to ban all investor citizenship programs across the EU by 2025, signaling a fundamental shift in the region's approach to investment migration.

Other Notable Programs

Several other citizenship programs have faced FATF scrutiny:

Turkey, offering citizenship through real estate investment, has been on the FATF grey list since 2021 due to deficiencies in combating money laundering and terrorist financing. While these issues extend beyond its citizenship program, the investment migration pathway has faced enhanced review.

Vanuatu's aggressive CBI approach led to grey-listing from 2016-2020 and triggered a separate dramatic consequence: the European Union suspended visa-free travel for all Vanuatu citizens in 2022 due to serious concerns about the program's due diligence standards.

This unprecedented move effectively devalued Vanuatu passports overnight and demonstrated how swiftly international authorities can respond to perceived risks in citizenship programs.

Money Laundering Risks in CBI Programs

The Fundamental Concerns

FATF, along with the OECD and IMF, has identified several inherent risks in citizenship-by-investment programs that applicants should understand:

Identity and Residency Arbitrage: CBI programs can potentially allow individuals to obtain a new legal identity, facilitating global mobility under what is effectively an alias. This may help bad actors obscure their country of origin and frustrate cross-border investigations.

Predicate Crime Proceeds: The substantial investments required for citizenship—whether in government funds, real estate, or businesses—could serve as vehicles for laundering proceeds from corruption, fraud, or tax evasion.

According to a joint FATF-OECD analysis in 2022, criminal exploitation of citizenship schemes "is a multi-billion-dollar business" used to launder proceeds of corruption and fraud, evade law enforcement, or circumvent sanctions.

Foreign Corruption Enablement: Countries with weaker governance may see citizenship programs exploited for bribery or as "pay-to-play" access points for elites, potentially facilitating corruption rather than legitimate investment.

Structural Vulnerabilities

Beyond individual risks, FATF has highlighted systemic vulnerabilities common in many citizenship programs:

Heavy reliance on promoters and intermediaries (law firms, consultants, agents) who may not undergo adequate AML supervision creates a potential weak link in the screening process.

The involvement of multiple government agencies can lead to coordination gaps and inconsistent application of standards. When information doesn't flow seamlessly between citizenship units, financial intelligence teams, and law enforcement, dangerous applicants may slip through.

Professional enablers—including accountants, lawyers, or officials—may facilitate illicit applicants in navigating program requirements, either knowingly or through negligence.

Perhaps most fundamentally, some programs suffer from inadequate governance, with insufficient oversight of vetting processes and limited transparency in reporting approvals and rejections.

Real-World Consequences

These risks aren't merely theoretical. Real-world cases have exposed citizenship programs approving fugitives and financial criminals.

Vanuatu provides a stark example: an EU review in 2019 found that the country had granted passports to individuals listed in Interpol databases and failed to detect forged supporting documents. This security lapse led to the previously mentioned suspension of visa-free travel for Vanuatu citizens.

Similarly, investigative reporting on Cyprus's program (the "Cyprus Papers") revealed dozens of high-risk individuals, including sanctioned persons, obtaining EU citizenship through investment—a scandal that ultimately ended the program.

AML Compliance Frameworks in CBI Jurisdictions

Due Diligence Approaches

In response to identified risks, jurisdictions with CBI programs have developed increasingly sophisticated compliance frameworks:

Know-Your-Customer (KYC) and Background Checks: All reputable programs require detailed background information and perform multifaceted due diligence. Many nations contract specialized firms to investigate applicants' source of funds, criminal records, and global reputations.

St. Kitts and Nevis, which operates the world's oldest CBI program, emphasizes its "rigorous due diligence and adherence to international standards" as key to its longevity. As of 2023, St. Kitts mandates personal interviews and biometric verification for all applicants.

Government Agency Vetting: Best practices involve the nation's Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) and law enforcement in the vetting process. All five Eastern Caribbean CBI countries now run each applicant's file past their FIU for independent background checks, per new agreements.

This cooperative approach ensures that information from crime databases and suspicious transaction reports informs citizenship decisions—not just commercial background checks.

Multi-tier Approval Process: Stronger programs implement a layered approval system where applications undergo review by internal due diligence teams, external specialists, security agencies, and final government approval boards.

This structure prevents any single point of failure in the screening process and ensures multiple perspectives evaluate each case.

Exclusions and Ongoing Monitoring

Once limited to basic background checks, today's citizenship programs increasingly incorporate sophisticated protocols:

Exclusion of High-Risk Applicants: Applications from individuals with prior criminal convictions, ongoing investigations, or sanctions designations are generally denied outright. Following geopolitical developments, nearly all CBI jurisdictions have stopped processing Russian and Belarusian applicants since 2022 due to elevated sanctions risks.

Revocation Powers: Leading programs maintain the authority to revoke citizenship if it was obtained under false pretenses or if the individual later becomes involved in criminal activity. The Eastern Caribbean states have agreed to improve the "retrieval of revoked passports," acknowledging the need to physically reclaim travel documents when citizenship is canceled.

Some jurisdictions also periodically re-screen their CBI citizens against updated watchlists, recognizing that risk profiles can change after citizenship is granted.

The Caribbean Six Principles

A significant development for program integrity emerged in February 2023, when the five Eastern Caribbean CBI countries adopted the "Six CBI Principles" to harmonize due diligence standards:

  1. Collective Denial Policy – No country will process an application from an individual rejected by another CBI jurisdiction, preventing "jurisdiction shopping" by high-risk applicants.
  2. Mandatory Interviews – All applicants must undergo in-person or virtual interviews to verify identity and intentions.
  3. Enhanced FIU Checks – Each application undergoes review by the national Financial Intelligence Unit, adding official intelligence to commercial background checks.
  4. Independent Audits – Regular external audits by internationally reputable firms review compliance processes and identify weaknesses.
  5. Revocation & Reporting Mechanisms – Implementing effective systems to revoke citizenships obtained through misinformation and share such information regionally.
  6. Restricted Nationalities – Suspension of processing applications from high-risk nationalities, specifically Russians and Belarusians as of 2023.

This collaborative approach represents a significant evolution in how citizenship programs manage risk and signals a new era of collective responsibility.

How International Pressure Has Changed CBI Programs

Program Closures and Reform

Mounting international pressure—from FATF evaluations, regional regulators, and foreign governments—has driven substantial changes to citizenship programs worldwide:

High-profile schemes have been terminated when reputational risks became untenable. Cyprus ended its program in 2020 after exposés revealed abuse by politically exposed persons, while Bulgaria's parliament voted in March 2022 to abolish its "golden passport" scheme following criticism from European authorities.

Over 100 foreigners (primarily from Russia, China, and the Middle East) had obtained Bulgarian passports since 2013, but under new laws, all pending applications were canceled and past grants placed under review.

At the EU level, there is now an explicit push to ban investor citizenship programs across the Union by 2025, reflecting a policy view that EU passports should not be commodities.

The Power of Grey-Listing

Being grey-listed by FATF imposes significant economic and reputational costs—a powerful motivator for reform:

Malta's year on the grey list (2021–22) led to accelerated AML improvements across its financial sector, including enhanced oversight of CBI-related financial flows, increased transparency regarding citizenship grants, and more aggressive prosecution of financial crimes.

Caribbean nations have been keen to avoid similar designation by proactively strengthening their CBI oversight. Jamaica and Barbados, which offer residency but not citizenship by investment, improved their AML controls and were successfully removed from the FATF grey list by 2023.

This sent a clear message to the region that compliance improvements yield tangible benefits and protection from international censure.

Visa Leverage and International Actions

Beyond FATF, other bodies have applied pressure through visa policies and direct engagement:

The European Union's suspension of visa-free travel for Vanuatu in 2022-23 demonstrated how quickly citizenship program vulnerabilities can affect an entire nation's passport value. By revoking Vanuatu citizens' Schengen Area visa waiver due to the country's lax CBI screening, the EU delivered a powerful message about minimum expected standards.

The United States has engaged directly with CBI countries, particularly in the Caribbean, to encourage tighter controls. The U.S. Treasury Department held multiple high-level roundtables with Eastern Caribbean governments in 2023, resulting in the Six Principles agreement.

Such diplomatic intervention—coupled with implicit access to international financial systems—has accelerated the pace of reforms considerably.

What This Means for Potential CBI Applicants

A New Application Reality

For those considering citizenship by investment, the regulatory landscape has forever changed what to expect:

Enhanced Due Diligence: Be prepared for increasingly thorough background checks, including interviews and potentially biometric verification. The days of "no questions asked" investment citizenship are firmly behind us.

Applications now routinely undergo screening against global sanctions lists, Interpol notices, and adverse media reports. Many programs also investigate family members and business associates to establish a complete risk profile.

Comprehensive Documentation: Today's programs require extensive proof of fund legitimacy. You'll need to demonstrate the source of your investment capital through multiple years of tax returns, business documents, employment contracts, inheritance records, or other verifiable sources.

Vague explanations about wealth origins that might have sufficed years ago will now likely trigger application denial. The burden of proof regarding clean funds rests firmly with the applicant.

To successfully obtain citizenship through investment in this environment:

Choose Programs Wisely: Consider not just passport benefits but program integrity. Jurisdictions with robust due diligence may require more documentation, but they also offer greater long-term security for your citizenship status and investment.

Programs under international scrutiny or those with a history of scandals may offer shorter processing times or lower costs, but they carry higher risks of devaluation, restriction, or even cancellation.

Transparency Is Your Ally: Approach the application process with complete transparency. Attempting to withhold relevant information almost certainly leads to rejection and potentially blacklisting from multiple programs under the new cooperative frameworks.

If you have complex financial histories or politically exposed status, address these directly with supporting documentation rather than hoping they won't be discovered.

Plan for Ongoing Compliance: Citizenship is increasingly not a "set and forget" acquisition. Many jurisdictions now conduct periodic reviews of economic citizens and may request updated information years after approval.

Maintaining proper tax compliance in both your new country and previous residences is essential for preserving your citizenship status and preventing revocation.

The Future of CBI Programs Under FATF Oversight

Looking ahead, several trends are reshaping the citizenship-by-investment landscape:

Standardization of Due Diligence: We're witnessing a convergence toward consistent vetting standards across jurisdictions. The days when programs competed by offering lighter touch due diligence are ending, replaced by a race toward demonstrable compliance excellence.

Technology Integration: Advanced identity verification, artificial intelligence screening of applications, and blockchain recording of citizenship grants are being deployed to enhance security and transparency while reducing human error in vetting.

Cross-Border Cooperation: Perhaps most significantly, citizenship programs are moving away from isolated operation toward unprecedented information sharing. The Caribbean's collective denial policy shows how jurisdictions now recognize their shared responsibility in preventing program misuse.

Outlook for Program Sustainability

Will citizenship-by-investment survive this regulatory evolution? The evidence suggests a two-track future:

Programs unwilling or unable to implement robust compliance frameworks will likely face existential pressure from international authorities. The EU's effective dismantling of member state CBI programs and Vanuatu's visa waiver suspension demonstrate how quickly viability can change.

However, programs that embrace transparency, cooperate with international bodies, and demonstrate genuine commitment to preventing abuse have pathways to sustainable operation. The successful removal of Malta from the FATF grey list shows that even programs under intense scrutiny can navigate this new environment.

The citizenship marketplace is undoubtedly consolidating, with fewer programs likely to operate in the future—but those that remain will offer greater stability and legitimacy for applicants.

Program Selection Strategies

With compliance now central to program quality, how should potential applicants evaluate their options?

Look for Transparency: Programs that publish statistics on applications, approvals, rejections, and revocations demonstrate a commitment to openness that correlates with better governance.

St. Kitts and Nevis, for example, has begun publishing quarterly reports on application volumes and processing times, representing a new level of transparency in the industry.

Assess International Reception: A program's standing with major economies provides insight into its likely future stability. Programs maintaining good relationships with the EU, UK, US, and Canada generally indicate better compliance standards and more sustainable visa-free travel arrangements.

Consider Regulatory History: Has the country faced FATF greylisting or other international sanctions? If so, how effectively did they address concerns? Nations that have successfully navigated regulatory challenges often emerge with stronger programs.

Malta's implementation of reforms following its FATF greylisting demonstrated institutional capacity and commitment that may ultimately strengthen its program's longevity.

Documentation Preparation

Success in today's compliance-focused environment requires thorough preparation:

Create a Financial Timeline: Develop a comprehensive narrative of your wealth creation with supporting documentation. This should typically cover at least 5-10 years and explain all major assets and income sources.

Address Potential Flags Proactively: If your profile includes potentially concerning elements—such as business in high-risk jurisdictions or politically exposed status—prepare explanatory documentation and independent verification rather than hoping these factors won't be discovered.

Invest in Professional Guidance: While citizenship consultants have always played a role in the application process, specialized expertise in compliance and documentation is now essential rather than optional.

Look for advisors who emphasize compliance rather than promising unrealistic processing times or exceptional treatment.

Balancing Opportunity with Compliance

Citizenship by investment stands at a crucial inflection point. The programs that emerged as relatively straightforward economic transactions have evolved into sophisticated pathways governed by international financial standards and subject to multilateral oversight.

For countries offering these programs, the message from FATF and other international bodies is unambiguous: citizenship can be offered as an investment opportunity, but only with safeguards that protect the integrity of the global financial and security systems.

For applicants, this evolution brings both challenges and benefits. The application process has become more demanding, requiring greater transparency and documentation. However, programs that meet these higher standards offer more secure and internationally respected citizenship—reducing the risk that your investment and status might be compromised by future scandals or restrictions.

The future belongs to programs that can balance economic benefit with robust compliance. As an applicant, aligning yourself with this direction not only increases your approval chances but protects your citizenship investment for years to come.

In this new landscape, success comes not from finding the quickest or cheapest citizenship option, but from engaging with programs that have made the difficult but necessary transition to full compliance with global financial integrity standards.

Your citizenship journey now intersects with some of the world's most significant financial security frameworks—but with proper preparation and realistic expectations, the pathway to new citizenship remains open for legitimate investors ready to navigate this complex but ultimately more sustainable environment.