
What a Nevis trust is, how the NIETO creditor barriers actually work, real 2026 pricing, honest limits, and when the Cook Islands wins instead.
Most of what you'll read about Nevis trusts online was written to get you onto a "free consultation" call, where the actual price appears only after a salesperson has sized you up. We think that's a bad way to buy a legal structure. So here's the whole picture: what a Nevis trust is, exactly how each creditor barrier works, what it costs (real numbers, not "contact us"), and the situations where it will do nothing for you at all.
Short version: a Nevis trust is one of the two strongest asset protection structures money can buy, it costs $15,000 to $22,000 to set up properly, and it is useless against creditors you already have. Everything else is detail. But the detail matters, so let's go through it.
A Nevis trust, formally a Nevis international exempt trust, is a trust registered under the Nevis International Exempt Trust Ordinance (NIETO) of 1994, amended most significantly in 2015. Nevis is the smaller of the two islands that make up the Federation of St. Kitts and Nevis, a Commonwealth country in the eastern Caribbean with its own legislature and, for our purposes, its own trust statute.
The structure works like any common law trust. You (the settlor) transfer assets to a trustee, who holds them for beneficiaries under the terms of a trust deed. The difference is what NIETO says about people who later try to take those assets. The Ordinance was drafted, quite openly, to make suing a Nevis trust so expensive and slow that most creditors give up and settle instead.
Two features of NIETO surprise people coming from US trust law:
The trust can be self-settled. You can be the settlor and a beneficiary of the same trust, with spendthrift protection, which most US states prohibit. A handful of states (Nevada, South Dakota, a few others) allow domestic versions, but a US judge can reach a US trust. That's the whole problem domestic asset protection trusts have never solved.
The rule against perpetuities does not apply. A Nevis trust can run indefinitely, which matters if you're thinking in terms of generations rather than a single lawsuit.
A common misconception is that your money disappears into a Caribbean vault and you lose touch with it. In practice, almost nobody funds a bare trust. The standard structure is a Nevis trust that owns 100% of a Nevis LLC, and you serve as manager of that LLC.
Here's why. As LLC manager, you keep signature authority over the accounts and wallets the LLC holds. Day to day, nothing about your financial life changes. You trade and rebalance exactly as before. The licensed Nevis trustee sits above the structure as owner of the LLC but doesn't touch your investments.
The trustee's job begins when yours has to end. If a US court orders you to bring the assets home, the trust deed's duress provisions kick in: the trustee removes you as LLC manager and refuses instructions given under compulsion. You genuinely cannot comply with the order, because you genuinely no longer control the assets. That's the mechanism. Not secrecy. Legal impossibility.
We'll be blunt about the trade this involves: you are trusting a regulated professional trustee in another country to follow the deed when things get hostile. Trustee selection is the single most important decision in the whole process, which is why we work only with licensed Nevis trustees we've vetted and why our formation process starts with trustee due diligence rather than paperwork.
Some clients also appoint a protector, an optional third party who can veto certain trustee decisions and replace the trustee altogether. Done right, the protector is a check on the trustee that doesn't hand control back to you, which means it should be someone outside your orbit and preferably outside US jurisdiction. Plenty of good structures skip the role entirely. A strong deed and a strong trustee carry the load either way.
Marketing pages list NIETO's features like bullet points on a spec sheet. More useful is to walk through what a creditor actually faces, in the order they'd face it. Picture a plaintiff who has just won a $3 million judgment against you in California and discovers your assets sit in a Nevis trust.
Nevis courts do not recognize or enforce foreign judgments against international trust property. The $3 million California judgment is a piece of paper. To touch the trust, the creditor must start over and re-litigate the entire underlying case in the High Court in Nevis, with Nevis lawyers, under Nevis procedure. US contingency-fee counsel can't run that case; Nevis attorneys generally require payment up front.
Before the creditor can even file suit against the trust property, NIETO requires them to post a bond with the Nevis court, in practice around USD 100,000. The 2015 amendments raised this from $25,000, and the increase tells you where Nevis thinks its competitive advantage lies. The bond secures the trust's costs if the claim fails. So the creditor is writing a six-figure check for the privilege of starting a lawsuit they will probably lose. This is Nevis's signature deterrent and, in our view, the single feature that most changes settlement negotiations. A creditor's lawyer has to explain to their client why they should wire $100,000 to a Caribbean court registry before anything else happens.
The creditor's only real theory is fraudulent transfer: that you moved assets into the trust to defeat their claim. In a US court, they'd prove that on a preponderance of the evidence, meaning 51%. In Nevis, they must prove fraudulent intent beyond reasonable doubt. That's the criminal standard, applied to a civil claim. Proving what was in your head years earlier, to a near-certainty, in a foreign courtroom, is close to impossible when the trust was funded before any dispute existed.
NIETO gives creditors one year from the date of the transfer into the trust, or two years from the date their cause of action arose, whichever is relevant, to bring a fraudulent transfer claim. Compare California, where creditors get four years and sometimes seven. Most plaintiffs don't even find the trust within a year. Once the limitation period runs, the funding is safe from challenge regardless of intent.
A concrete illustration. You fund the trust in March 2026. A business dispute erupts in mid 2027, and the plaintiff finally wins their US judgment in late 2028. By the time their lawyers locate the trust, both Nevis limitation periods expired long ago, so the transfer cannot be challenged in Nevis at all, whatever they suspect about your motives. The clock rewards people who set up early, which is the entire point.
In many jurisdictions a creditor's first move is a Mareva injunction, a court order freezing assets before trial so they can't be moved. NIETO prohibits Mareva-style injunctions against international trust property. The creditor can't lock things down while they litigate. The trustee stays free to administer, and if the deed contains a flee clause, to migrate the trust elsewhere.
English common law inherited the Fraudulent Conveyances Act 1571, the "Statute of Elizabeth," which lets creditors unwind transfers made with intent to defraud, sometimes with no time limit at all. Many offshore jurisdictions never dealt with it cleanly. Nevis abolished it by statute. The only route to attack a transfer is NIETO's own fraudulent transfer provision, with the six-figure bond and criminal standard described above.
Nevis maintains no public register of settlors or beneficiaries. Registration filings identify the trust and its registered agent, nothing more. A creditor running an asset search has no Nevis database to query. Privacy is not protection (we'd never sell it as such), but it raises the cost of the discovery phase, and cost is the whole game.
Stack these together and you see why contested claims against properly established Nevis trusts are rare. The rational creditor move is to settle for a fraction of the judgment, and that is exactly what tends to happen.
This is the section most providers skip, because it shortens the sales call. We'd rather you know before you wire anything.
It will not protect you from creditors you already have. If you're being sued, have been threatened with suit, or know a claim is coming, funding a Nevis trust now is a fraudulent transfer under US law, full stop. A US court doesn't need Nevis's cooperation to punish you for it. Judges have voided such transfers and sanctioned the debtors who made them. A Nevis trust is insurance. Nobody sells fire insurance on a burning house, and we won't either. If you have an active claim, you need a litigator, not a trustee.
It cannot move US real estate offshore. Your house sits in a county recorder's office within a US court's jurisdiction, and no deed drafted in Charlestown changes that. A US judge can order the property sold no matter who nominally owns it. Real estate needs domestic tools (LLCs and umbrella insurance, plus homestead exemptions in some states). The Nevis trust is for portable assets.
It does not make you invisible to the IRS. A Nevis trust settled by a US person is a grantor trust: tax neutral, meaning you pay exactly the income tax you'd pay without it. And you must report it. Forms 3520 and 3520-A annually, FBAR (FinCEN Form 114) for foreign accounts, Form 8938 where thresholds are met. Penalties start at $10,000 per form per year and climb from there. Anyone who pitches a Nevis trust as a tax play is selling you an IRS problem. We flag the filing duties in writing before engagement, and every client needs a US CPA who has actually prepared a 3520-A before.
The contempt risk is real. A US judge who believes you still control offshore assets can order you to repatriate them and jail you for contempt when you don't. In FTC v. Affordable Media (the "Anderson" case), a couple sat in custody over their Cook Islands trust. The defense is genuine impossibility: a properly drafted deed, real trustee independence, and duress provisions that actually operate. Courts have accepted impossibility where the structure was real and the settlor wasn't playing games. Structures set up mid-lawsuit, or where the settlor kept de facto control, are where people get hurt. This is a reason to do it early and do it properly, not a reason to skip it.
The Cook Islands invented the modern asset protection trust in 1989, and Nevis followed in 1994 with a statute that borrowed the good parts and added the bond. If you're choosing between them, here's our honest read. (The full comparison is in our Cook Islands trust guide.)
The Cook Islands wins on case law. Its trusts have been attacked in US courts for three decades, including by the FTC and the SEC, and the structure has held. If you expect a sophisticated, well-funded adversary such as a federal agency, that litigation history is worth paying for.
Nevis wins on price and deterrence. Nevis runs roughly 30 to 40% cheaper: figure $15,000 to $22,000 first year against $15,000 to $35,000 for the Cook Islands, and about $5,000 to $6,000 a year ongoing against $5,000 to $10,000. The Cook Islands trust also sits 13 time zones from New York; Nevis is one hour off US Eastern time, which makes working with your trustee noticeably less annoying. And the $100,000 bond is unique to Nevis. The Cook Islands makes a lawsuit hard; Nevis makes it hard and charges admission.
For most US clients protecting under $10 million against ordinary litigation risk (malpractice, business disputes, the usual), we think Nevis is the better buy. Above that, or against a government adversary, the Cook Islands' track record starts to justify its premium. Some clients split the difference with a Nevis trust drafted to flee to the Cook Islands under duress. Sensible.
Good candidates for funding:
Bitcoin deserves its own paragraph because a large share of our clients hold it. Bitcoin is the most portable asset ever created, which makes it both the best and the trickiest thing to put in a trust. The clean setups use multisig or collaborative custody: keys distributed so that no single party, including you, can move coins alone, with the trustee or a custody provider holding a key subject to the deed's duress provisions. A trust that "owns" bitcoin you can still spend unilaterally from a hardware wallet in your desk protects nothing; a US judge will simply order you to sign, and impossibility won't save you because compliance isn't impossible. We cover the custody architectures in our guide to offshore trusts for bitcoin.
On thresholds: below roughly $500,000 in liquid assets, the setup and running costs eat too large a share of what you're protecting. Domestic LLCs and umbrella insurance are the better spend at that level. Above $500,000, and certainly above $1 million, the math works.
Keep out anything you'll need on short notice. The trust should hold the layer of wealth you're defending for the long term, while operating cash and spending money stay onshore in your own name. Settlors who route their daily finances through the structure create exactly the pattern of control a US court hunts for later, and they annoy their trustee in the process.
Full line-item detail is in our Nevis trust cost breakdown. The summary:
| Item | First year | Ongoing (annual) |
|---|---|---|
| Trust drafting and structuring | $10,000–$15,000 | n/a |
| Licensed Nevis trustee | ~$6,000 | $3,500–$5,000 |
| Nevis government registration | $500–$1,000 | $300–$500 |
| Nevis LLC (optional, usual) | ~$5,000 | ~$1,000 |
| US CPA foreign-trust tax prep | $1,500–$3,000 | $1,500–$3,000 |
| Typical all-in | $15,000–$22,000 | $5,000–$6,000 |
CitizenX charges a flat fee of [CitizenX flat fee — insert], published on our site. The fee covers structuring through partner counsel, trustee onboarding, entity formation, and registration. No consultation call required to learn the number. We think you should be able to price a trust the way you price anything else.
Here's something specific to us. Nevis is half of the Federation of St. Kitts and Nevis, which runs the world's oldest citizenship by investment program (since 1984). CitizenX's core business is citizenship, and we handle St. Kitts and Nevis citizenship directly. That means a client can acquire a second passport and settle a Nevis trust in the same jurisdiction, through one provider, with one KYC and source-of-funds package doing double duty. The due diligence file you compile for the citizenship application is substantially the file the trustee needs. For sovereignty-minded clients who want both an exit option and an asset protection structure, doing them together saves months of duplicated document work. No trust company can offer that, and no citizenship firm we know of does trusts. We happen to sit at the intersection.
We're a Swiss-based facilitator, not a law firm. The trust deed is drafted by partner counsel, the trust is administered by a licensed Nevis trustee, and your US tax reporting is handled by your CPA (we'll introduce you to ones who know Form 3520-A cold if you need one). Our job is running the process, which looks like this:
End to end, plan on 4 to 8 weeks. The step-by-step version, with the drafting decisions that actually matter, is in the formation guide.
One opinion to close the main text: the offshore trust industry has earned its reputation for opacity, and that opacity is a choice. Hidden pricing, and secrecy oversold while the tax duties sit in a footnote. None of it is necessary. A Nevis trust set up early, funded with clean money, reported properly to the IRS, and administered by a real trustee is a legitimate and formidable structure. Set up late or half-reported, it's a liability. The difference is entirely in how it's done.
Yes. US persons may settle foreign trusts, and thousands have. What's required is disclosure: Forms 3520 and 3520-A each year, FBAR for foreign accounts over $10,000 aggregate, and Form 8938 above its thresholds. The trust is legal; hiding it is not.
Around $500,000 in liquid, portable assets is the sensible floor. Below that, first-year costs of $15,000 to $22,000 plus $5,000 to $6,000 a year consume too much of the protected pool. Domestic planning is the better buy under that line.
Not directly. Nevis courts won't enforce the US judgment, so the trust property itself is out of reach. What a US court can do is pressure you personally, including contempt sanctions, if it believes you retain control. A properly drafted deed with real duress provisions, set up before any claim existed, is what makes the impossibility defense credible.
No. As a grantor trust it is tax neutral: you pay the same income tax as before. Anyone marketing it as a tax shelter is wrong, and dangerously so given the penalty regime for foreign trust reporting.
In the standard trust-plus-LLC structure, yes. You act as manager of the Nevis LLC and keep day-to-day signature authority. The trustee replaces you as manager only under duress, meaning when a court order or coercion triggers the deed's provisions.
Same design, different emphasis. Nevis adds a roughly $100,000 bond a creditor must post just to sue, and costs 30 to 40% less to establish and run. The Cook Islands has deeper litigation history, including cases where trusts survived attacks by US federal agencies. Sophisticated adversary: lean Cook Islands. Ordinary litigation risk: Nevis is usually the better value.
4 to 8 weeks in total. Trustee due diligence takes 2 to 4 weeks, entity formation 1 to 3 weeks, and offshore account opening 3 to 6 weeks, with some steps running in parallel.
The trust continues under the deed's terms, and because Nevis abolished the rule against perpetuities, it can continue indefinitely. Assets pass to beneficiaries per your distribution instructions, outside probate and without the trust dissolving.
This article is general information, not legal or tax advice. CitizenX is a facilitator working with licensed Nevis trustees and independent partner counsel; we are not a law firm and do not provide legal or tax opinions. Speak with qualified counsel and a US tax professional before establishing any foreign trust.